Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 491 - 500 of 78558 for WA 0821 1305 0400 [[Adefa]] Order Paving Ramah Lingkungan Nunukan Kalimantan Utara.
Search results 491 - 500 of 78558 for WA 0821 1305 0400 [[Adefa]] Order Paving Ramah Lingkungan Nunukan Kalimantan Utara.
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50544 - 2010-06-01
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50544 - 2010-06-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
, V. CITY OF OSHKOSH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50544 - 2014-09-15
, V. CITY OF OSHKOSH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50544 - 2014-09-15
WI App 95 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2032 Complete Title ...
erred in concluding, as a matter of law, that Avudria was not a “person who [wa]s aggrieved” under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64248 - 2011-06-28
erred in concluding, as a matter of law, that Avudria was not a “person who [wa]s aggrieved” under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64248 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
WI APP 95
in concluding, as a matter of law, that Avudria was not a “person who [wa]s aggrieved” under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64248 - 2014-09-15
in concluding, as a matter of law, that Avudria was not a “person who [wa]s aggrieved” under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64248 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
§ 66.1003 order because his property does not “abut” the discontinued alley portions, as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60051 - 2011-03-29
§ 66.1003 order because his property does not “abut” the discontinued alley portions, as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60051 - 2011-03-29
[PDF]
WI APP 41
) (2007-08).1 The Town argues that Smerz2 has no standing to challenge its § 66.1003 order because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60051 - 2014-09-15
) (2007-08).1 The Town argues that Smerz2 has no standing to challenge its § 66.1003 order because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60051 - 2014-09-15
City of Watertown v. Jeffrey Busshardt
Busshardt's objections, he was tried on the charge. He was found to have violated the ordinance and ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9131 - 2005-03-31
Busshardt's objections, he was tried on the charge. He was found to have violated the ordinance and ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9131 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Genett
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from judgments and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12618 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from judgments and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12618 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Watertown v. Jeffrey Busshardt
and ordered to pay a $145 forfeiture. Other facts will be discussed in the body of the opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9131 - 2017-09-19
and ordered to pay a $145 forfeiture. Other facts will be discussed in the body of the opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9131 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, [or] highways . . . ." Pursuant to the requirements of that section, the Village issued a relocation order
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816802 - 2024-09-09
, [or] highways . . . ." Pursuant to the requirements of that section, the Village issued a relocation order
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816802 - 2024-09-09