Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49131 - 49140 of 57651 for id.
Search results 49131 - 49140 of 57651 for id.
CA Blank Order
are the protection of the community, punishment and rehabilitation of the defendant, and deterrence to others. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102220 - 2013-09-24
are the protection of the community, punishment and rehabilitation of the defendant, and deterrence to others. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102220 - 2013-09-24
State v. Wylie McDonald, Jr.
must be reasonable under the totality of the circumstances. Id. at 139, 456 N.W.2d at 834. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11733 - 2005-03-31
must be reasonable under the totality of the circumstances. Id. at 139, 456 N.W.2d at 834. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11733 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Danny R. Mays
court's discretion. Id. In sentencing Mays, the trial court noted that although he did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10124 - 2017-09-19
court's discretion. Id. In sentencing Mays, the trial court noted that although he did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10124 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jermaine Smith
the declarant regarding the statement. Id. at 68. He argues, therefore, that the State should not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18389 - 2005-07-26
the declarant regarding the statement. Id. at 68. He argues, therefore, that the State should not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18389 - 2005-07-26
State v. Johnny L. White
is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See id. The constitutional right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11473 - 2005-03-31
is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See id. The constitutional right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11473 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry R. Dowe
). This presumption is overcome by the demonstration of a contrary legislative intent. See id. at 495, 485 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8589 - 2005-03-31
). This presumption is overcome by the demonstration of a contrary legislative intent. See id. at 495, 485 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Nichols
for the challenged conduct are factual and will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. See id. We will not overturn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14094 - 2014-09-15
for the challenged conduct are factual and will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. See id. We will not overturn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14094 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be served. See id. As noted, Tunstall claims sentence credit in this case from his arrest on April 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813552 - 2024-06-18
to be served. See id. As noted, Tunstall claims sentence credit in this case from his arrest on April 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813552 - 2024-06-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30894 - 2014-09-15
there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30894 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
,” it is unreasonable to require that F.E.K. be informed of unacceptable alternatives that do not exist. See id. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140986 - 2015-04-29
,” it is unreasonable to require that F.E.K. be informed of unacceptable alternatives that do not exist. See id. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140986 - 2015-04-29