Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5331 - 5340 of 29942 for des.
Search results 5331 - 5340 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 67
. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. Our review of the sufficiency of a postconviction motion is de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82910 - 2014-09-15
. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. Our review of the sufficiency of a postconviction motion is de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82910 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 116
Statutory interpretation is a matter of law; we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122875 - 2014-12-08
Statutory interpretation is a matter of law; we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122875 - 2014-12-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requires is de novo. State v. Devries, 2011 WI App 78, ¶2, 334 Wis. 2d 430, 433, 801 N.W.2d 336, 337
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73486 - 2014-09-15
requires is de novo. State v. Devries, 2011 WI App 78, ¶2, 334 Wis. 2d 430, 433, 801 N.W.2d 336, 337
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73486 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
characterization that this is a “simple and straightforward contract action,” such that we should accord de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214776 - 2018-06-27
characterization that this is a “simple and straightforward contract action,” such that we should accord de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214776 - 2018-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law an appellate court reviews de novo. Linden v. Cascade Stone Co., 2005 WI 113, ¶5, 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164095 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law an appellate court reviews de novo. Linden v. Cascade Stone Co., 2005 WI 113, ¶5, 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164095 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decision is de novo, but we use the same method as the circuit court. See Pinter v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96750 - 2013-05-13
judgment decision is de novo, but we use the same method as the circuit court. See Pinter v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96750 - 2013-05-13
State v. Matthew R.L.
, because this court’s function is to correct legal errors. Therefore, we will review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12080 - 2005-03-31
, because this court’s function is to correct legal errors. Therefore, we will review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12080 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47325 - 2010-02-24
standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47325 - 2010-02-24
wi app 70 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1928 Complete Title of...
in connection with the health-care-coverage provisions in the 2010-2012 labor agreement. On our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95527 - 2013-05-28
in connection with the health-care-coverage provisions in the 2010-2012 labor agreement. On our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95527 - 2013-05-28
Jerry M. v. Dennis L. M.
agree with Dennis that the standard of review governing this issue is de novo. While a court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8490 - 2005-03-31
agree with Dennis that the standard of review governing this issue is de novo. While a court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8490 - 2005-03-31