Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56521 - 56530 of 83653 for case search.
Search results 56521 - 56530 of 83653 for case search.
Lynn Wonka v. Samuel Cari
2001 WI App 274 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3522 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 274 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3522 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce A. Rumage
review de novo. See id. Rumage would have been prejudiced only if this case actually presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12093 - 2025-12-08
review de novo. See id. Rumage would have been prejudiced only if this case actually presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12093 - 2025-12-08
State v. Wesley Higgins
recklessly endangering safety while armed, as a party to a crime, and the case proceeded to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10568 - 2005-03-31
recklessly endangering safety while armed, as a party to a crime, and the case proceeded to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10568 - 2005-03-31
State v. William Lee Brown
provided in this chapter, criminal cases shall be tried by a jury selected as prescribed in s. 805.08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13495 - 2005-03-31
provided in this chapter, criminal cases shall be tried by a jury selected as prescribed in s. 805.08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13495 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jaamal D. Bell
be “important testimony that bore on an important issue of the case.” Id. ¶10 We conclude that the phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4927 - 2005-03-31
be “important testimony that bore on an important issue of the case.” Id. ¶10 We conclude that the phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4927 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and denied the motion. The case went to trial before a jury and Mills was convicted of his second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42813 - 2009-11-03
and denied the motion. The case went to trial before a jury and Mills was convicted of his second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42813 - 2009-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
requirement; rather, an exigency in this context must be determined case by case based on the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98183 - 2013-06-17
requirement; rather, an exigency in this context must be determined case by case based on the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98183 - 2013-06-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for an Illinois case and on house arrest at the time of the offense. He also argues that trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973880 - 2025-06-24
for an Illinois case and on house arrest at the time of the offense. He also argues that trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973880 - 2025-06-24
State v. Lue Her
that the orderly and efficient progression of the case is being frustrated by the defendant’s repeated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7611 - 2005-03-31
that the orderly and efficient progression of the case is being frustrated by the defendant’s repeated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7611 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the case, alleging a speedy trial violation. The trial court denied the motion, granted the adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
the case, alleging a speedy trial violation. The trial court denied the motion, granted the adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19