Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59211 - 59220 of 59594 for do.
Search results 59211 - 59220 of 59594 for do.
[PDF]
State v. Michael F. Howard
the prosecutor’s breach, the circumstances do not “require” a new trial. United States v. Kurkculer, 918 F.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2852 - 2017-09-19
the prosecutor’s breach, the circumstances do not “require” a new trial. United States v. Kurkculer, 918 F.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2852 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
marks omitted). Indeed, the Cornett court stated that “a prosecutor’s improper comments do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296468 - 2020-10-20
marks omitted). Indeed, the Cornett court stated that “a prosecutor’s improper comments do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296468 - 2020-10-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
the 1989 option if Rudolph had not induced her to do so. Nina also alleged that after this cancellation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52019 - 2014-09-15
the 1989 option if Rudolph had not induced her to do so. Nina also alleged that after this cancellation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52019 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy P. Zoellick
because he did not do “anything to provoke a disturbance other than being in the presence of the alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6829 - 2005-03-31
because he did not do “anything to provoke a disturbance other than being in the presence of the alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6829 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jermaine McFarland
by the objective standard of what a reasonably prudent attorney would do in similar circumstances. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17666 - 2005-04-11
by the objective standard of what a reasonably prudent attorney would do in similar circumstances. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17666 - 2005-04-11
Order-SC
, my three colleagues cannot conclude, as they do, that Justice Gableman has satisfied the requirements
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84639 - 2012-07-04
, my three colleagues cannot conclude, as they do, that Justice Gableman has satisfied the requirements
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84639 - 2012-07-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the privacy of the victim, we refer to her as A.B., using initials that do not correspond to her name. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010270 - 2025-09-18
the privacy of the victim, we refer to her as A.B., using initials that do not correspond to her name. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010270 - 2025-09-18
State v. Timothy M. Secrist
as factfinders are permitted to do the same – and so are law enforcement officers. These cases demonstrate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17299 - 2005-03-31
as factfinders are permitted to do the same – and so are law enforcement officers. These cases demonstrate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17299 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel D. King
. was not “unavailable” for confrontation purposes. Accordingly, we do not address whether King’s opportunity to cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19747 - 2005-10-27
. was not “unavailable” for confrontation purposes. Accordingly, we do not address whether King’s opportunity to cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19747 - 2005-10-27
[PDF]
Marinette County v. Tammy C.
, but decided not to file a new CHIPS petition. The parties' briefs do not state No. 97-2946 5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17312 - 2017-09-21
, but decided not to file a new CHIPS petition. The parties' briefs do not state No. 97-2946 5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17312 - 2017-09-21