Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62941 - 62950 of 83437 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 62941 - 62950 of 83437 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude No. 2016AP1886 2 at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207819 - 2018-01-30
of the briefs and record, we conclude No. 2016AP1886 2 at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207819 - 2018-01-30
Susan K. Roemer v. Susan Riseling
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2893, 96-2895, 96-2916, 96-2917
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17169 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2893, 96-2895, 96-2916, 96-2917
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17169 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. To establish a factual basis for the plea, the court took testimony from the case worker for the Children’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91686 - 2013-01-14
. To establish a factual basis for the plea, the court took testimony from the case worker for the Children’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91686 - 2013-01-14
State v. Charles Garven
interview notes does not demonstrate that in this case he acted in bad faith. Next, Garven argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11722 - 2005-03-31
interview notes does not demonstrate that in this case he acted in bad faith. Next, Garven argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11722 - 2005-03-31
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. Wisconsin Parole Commission
2000 WI App 139 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15849 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 139 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15849 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan M.
or the parties and the interest of the public in the prompt disposition of cases. (continued) No. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16042 - 2017-09-21
or the parties and the interest of the public in the prompt disposition of cases. (continued) No. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16042 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim of self- defense “[did] not fully capture all of the facts of this case.” This appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
claim of self- defense “[did] not fully capture all of the facts of this case.” This appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869471 - 2024-10-31
. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869471 - 2024-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this was a close case, and we do not consider that testimony in our review of the prejudice prong of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95673 - 2014-09-15
this was a close case, and we do not consider that testimony in our review of the prejudice prong of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95673 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185462 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185462 - 2017-09-21