Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7241 - 7250 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7241 - 7250 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. John C. Schroeder
presents a question of statutory interpretation. We review such questions of law de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14481 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of statutory interpretation. We review such questions of law de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14481 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102956 - 2013-10-15
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102956 - 2013-10-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d at 54. ¶4 We conclude that the traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74818 - 2011-12-06
of law that we review de novo. See Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d at 54. ¶4 We conclude that the traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74818 - 2011-12-06
State v. Nate Wilson
). We consider de novo whether Wilson’s motion alleged facts which, if true, entitle him to relief. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
). We consider de novo whether Wilson’s motion alleged facts which, if true, entitle him to relief. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah J. Burch
of law, which we review de novo. See id. at 54. ¶7 We conclude the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2478 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. See id. at 54. ¶7 We conclude the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terry L. Holloway
they are clearly erroneous.” Id. The second step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5627 - 2017-09-19
they are clearly erroneous.” Id. The second step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5627 - 2017-09-19
Michael T. Rohrer v. Mark T. Willis
that we review de novo. Id. ¶11 Here, the trial court dismissed the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5411 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Id. ¶11 Here, the trial court dismissed the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5411 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason Tyrrell
. We review constitutional issues de novo. State v. West, 185 Wis.2d 68, 89-90, 517 N.W.2d 482, 489
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8908 - 2005-03-31
. We review constitutional issues de novo. State v. West, 185 Wis.2d 68, 89-90, 517 N.W.2d 482, 489
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8908 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sufficient reason is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
a sufficient reason is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
Town of Windsor v. Village of DeForest
review summary judgment decisions de novo using the same methodology as the trial court. Cemetery Servs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3402 - 2005-03-31
review summary judgment decisions de novo using the same methodology as the trial court. Cemetery Servs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3402 - 2005-03-31