Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 74131 - 74140 of 78112 for restraining orders.
Search results 74131 - 74140 of 78112 for restraining orders.
City of Madison v. Daniel W. Miller
the Madison Municipal Court. The municipal court issued a decision and order finding Miller guilty of the red
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11220 - 2005-03-31
the Madison Municipal Court. The municipal court issued a decision and order finding Miller guilty of the red
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an exception to this rule, which allows appellate review of an order denying a motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102984 - 2017-09-21
an exception to this rule, which allows appellate review of an order denying a motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102984 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by denying his suppression motion.3 3 An order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441190 - 2021-10-13
by denying his suppression motion.3 3 An order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441190 - 2021-10-13
[PDF]
James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
, in order to preserve the electorate’s will, see WIS. STAT. § 5.01(1); Gradinjan v. Boho, 29 Wis. 2d 674
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
, in order to preserve the electorate’s will, see WIS. STAT. § 5.01(1); Gradinjan v. Boho, 29 Wis. 2d 674
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Chad A. Klessig
right to proceed pro se. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 819 (1975). In order to represent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9364 - 2017-09-19
right to proceed pro se. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 819 (1975). In order to represent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9364 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
) provides: “Any person suffering pecuniary loss because of a violation by any other person of any order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96263 - 2013-05-01
) provides: “Any person suffering pecuniary loss because of a violation by any other person of any order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96263 - 2013-05-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, time served, and was ordered to provide a DNA sample, to pay the DNA surcharge, and to pay all other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285364 - 2020-09-09
, time served, and was ordered to provide a DNA sample, to pay the DNA surcharge, and to pay all other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285364 - 2020-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to temporarily freeze the situation in order to investigate further. ¶12 Here, Schubel observed Beckman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66557 - 2011-06-28
to temporarily freeze the situation in order to investigate further. ¶12 Here, Schubel observed Beckman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66557 - 2011-06-28
COURT OF APPEALS
in the vehicle. We therefore affirm the trial court’s order denying Cotton’s motion to suppress.[2] ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65354 - 2011-06-07
in the vehicle. We therefore affirm the trial court’s order denying Cotton’s motion to suppress.[2] ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65354 - 2011-06-07
COURT OF APPEALS
the meaning of the Fourth Amendment; therefore, the stop must be based on a reasonable suspicion in order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72011 - 2011-10-11
the meaning of the Fourth Amendment; therefore, the stop must be based on a reasonable suspicion in order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72011 - 2011-10-11