Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7921 - 7930 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7921 - 7930 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶5 “[R]elief under habeas corpus will not be granted where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32320 - 2008-04-07
of the law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶5 “[R]elief under habeas corpus will not be granted where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32320 - 2008-04-07
State v. Angelo T. Kaszuba
. Whether counsel’s performance prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10006 - 2005-03-31
. Whether counsel’s performance prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10006 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
are undisputed, as they are in this case, our review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14461 - 2005-03-31
are undisputed, as they are in this case, our review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14461 - 2005-03-31
State v. Demetri Manto
reviews de novo. See id. The United States Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15394 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See id. The United States Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15394 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
denied this due process right is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. Here, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873696 - 2024-11-13
denied this due process right is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. Here, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873696 - 2024-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Felix, 339 Wis. 2d 670, ¶22. Applying that standard, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064680 - 2026-01-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Felix, 339 Wis. 2d 670, ¶22. Applying that standard, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064680 - 2026-01-21
State v. Corie S. Bergeron
.2d 642, 643 (Ct. App. 1996). This involves a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14371 - 2005-03-31
.2d 642, 643 (Ct. App. 1996). This involves a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sean R. Haverty
rejected Haverty’s arguments and revoked his license. ¶8 This court reviews de novo whether undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21286 - 2017-09-21
rejected Haverty’s arguments and revoked his license. ¶8 This court reviews de novo whether undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21286 - 2017-09-21
Jerome R. Christensen v. City of Racine Police and Fire Commission
. See § 62.13(5)(i), Stats., 1991-92;[2] see also State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis.2d 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8003 - 2005-03-31
. See § 62.13(5)(i), Stats., 1991-92;[2] see also State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis.2d 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8003 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
findings of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123369 - 2014-10-06
findings of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123369 - 2014-10-06