Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8581 - 8590 of 63485 for records.
Search results 8581 - 8590 of 63485 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2022AP466-CR 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this matter is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613449 - 2023-01-24
No. 2022AP466-CR 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this matter is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613449 - 2023-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the record reflects the CI had been arrested and debriefed, offered information about a drug dealer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575519 - 2022-10-11
, the record reflects the CI had been arrested and debriefed, offered information about a drug dealer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575519 - 2022-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202509 - 2017-11-15
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202509 - 2017-11-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the criminal conviction still remains in the record with the Department of Justice (DOJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86046 - 2014-09-15
, the criminal conviction still remains in the record with the Department of Justice (DOJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86046 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lenny P. Keding
to revocation is required by due process. Finally, he argues that the record does not support the circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16399 - 2005-03-31
to revocation is required by due process. Finally, he argues that the record does not support the circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16399 - 2005-03-31
William F. Kelsey v. Jens Otto Luebow
on the record: [T]he defendant [Luebow] agrees to pay to the plaintiff on or before December 1, 1996, the sum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2005-03-31
on the record: [T]he defendant [Luebow] agrees to pay to the plaintiff on or before December 1, 1996, the sum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence on the record, or address every detail of that evidence on the record, in order to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94978 - 2014-09-15
the evidence on the record, or address every detail of that evidence on the record, in order to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94978 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conviction. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177448 - 2017-09-21
conviction. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177448 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Marinko, Sr.
in the record, applies the correct law and, using a rational mental process, arrives at a reasonable result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4904 - 2017-09-19
in the record, applies the correct law and, using a rational mental process, arrives at a reasonable result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4904 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, and thus was reliable to support reasonable suspicion. We conclude that the record does not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33189 - 2008-06-25
, and thus was reliable to support reasonable suspicion. We conclude that the record does not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33189 - 2008-06-25