Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8891 - 8900 of 50086 for our.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
information, and that he was not competent during the plea and sentencing proceedings. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260975 - 2020-05-19

COURT OF APPEALS
argues that we should exercise our discretion to reverse the judgment and order a new trial. We may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35146 - 2009-01-12

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
to recognize Wisconsin’s grant of sentence credit, our research has convinced us otherwise. We are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47046 - 2010-03-30

[PDF] WI APP 71
the appropriate statute for counting purposes. 2 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82279 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
contends were “electronic communications.” See WIS. STAT. § 814.04(2) (2019-20).1 Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523845 - 2022-05-24

[PDF] State v. Keyun Utsey
before our courts. It is a terrible and addictive poison that’s put into our community. And when you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19728 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective. Upon our independent review of the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30

[PDF] NOTICE
11, 2005 denial of Grothmann’s petition for review of our opinion. ¶6 With the appellate process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26834 - 2014-09-15

2006 WI APP 218
its language to see whether it has a plain and unambiguous meaning. If it does, we end our inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26563 - 2006-10-30

[PDF] NOTICE
trial. We will set forth more detailed facts in the course of our discussion. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30830 - 2014-09-15