Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 34871 - 34880 of 45815 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 34871 - 34880 of 45815 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
NOTICE
, this court uses the two-element test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27843 - 2014-09-15
, this court uses the two-element test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27843 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
U.S. 429, 436-38 (1988). The test is not whether the attorney expects the argument to prevail
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175163 - 2017-09-21
U.S. 429, 436-38 (1988). The test is not whether the attorney expects the argument to prevail
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175163 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by counsel, now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 The test for ambiguity in sentencing disputes is the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132254 - 2017-09-21
by counsel, now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 The test for ambiguity in sentencing disputes is the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132254 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven L. Harris
(1990). The prejudice test is whether counsel’s errors were so serious that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20351 - 2017-09-21
(1990). The prejudice test is whether counsel’s errors were so serious that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20351 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness is a common sense test.” State v. Post, 2007 WI 60, ¶13, 301 Wis. 2d 1, 733 N.W.2d 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143503 - 2017-09-21
of reasonableness is a common sense test.” State v. Post, 2007 WI 60, ¶13, 301 Wis. 2d 1, 733 N.W.2d 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Allen Bruski
of privacy as reasonable. Id. ¶14 The second prong is, however, an objective test, that relies on six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21227 - 2017-09-21
of privacy as reasonable. Id. ¶14 The second prong is, however, an objective test, that relies on six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21227 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the test for determining whether a defendant’s presence is constitutionally required during a criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209233 - 2018-03-06
that the test for determining whether a defendant’s presence is constitutionally required during a criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209233 - 2018-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also included $995 for a personality test to assess new employees and $90 for a new employee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209072 - 2018-03-01
also included $995 for a personality test to assess new employees and $90 for a new employee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209072 - 2018-03-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the deficiency prong of the Strickland test in Wisconsin for criminal defendants alleging in a habeas petition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166271 - 2017-09-21
for the deficiency prong of the Strickland test in Wisconsin for criminal defendants alleging in a habeas petition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166271 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“The harmless error test ... is focused on ‘whether, assuming that the damaging potential of the cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223974 - 2018-10-25
“The harmless error test ... is focused on ‘whether, assuming that the damaging potential of the cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223974 - 2018-10-25

