Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4631 - 4640 of 81949 for judges.

[PDF] Steven Theuer v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Argument: February 28, 2001 Source of APPEAL COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Racine JUDGE: Richard J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16377 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. William E. Marberry
: November 24, 1999 Submitted on Briefs: September 10, 1999 JUDGES: Dykman, P.J., Eich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14594 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of the circuit court for Sauk County: GUY D. REYNOLDS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29183 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 150
, 2013 Submitted on Briefs: October 8, 2013 Oral Argument: JUDGES: Curley, P.J., Fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103832 - 2017-09-21

WI App 150 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP310-CR Complete Title...
. Opinion Filed: November 5, 2013 Submitted on Briefs: October 8, 2013 Oral Argument: JUDGES: Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103832 - 2013-11-04

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=123&year=2009

Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Milwaukee
: --- Oral Argument: November 5, 2002 JUDGES: Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Curley, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5003 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Milwaukee
Argument: November 5, 2002 JUDGES: Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Curley, JJ. Concurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5003 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael A. Grindemann
-Respondent. † Opinion Filed: April 18, 2002 Submitted on Briefs: December 7, 2001 JUDGES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3657 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] PPAC Effective Justice Strategies Phase II Final Report
to provide judges with valid and reliable information to help inform case disposition decisions. The AIM
/courts/committees/docs/finalreport.pdf - 2013-12-11