Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56951 - 56960 of 59464 for quit claim deed.
Search results 56951 - 56960 of 59464 for quit claim deed.
2008 WI App 22
.” Robert T.’s attorney filed a motion seeking dismissal on several grounds, including his claim that Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31483 - 2008-03-11
.” Robert T.’s attorney filed a motion seeking dismissal on several grounds, including his claim that Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31483 - 2008-03-11
2009 WI APP 139
claim that the Deerprint development changed the use of the existing property and therefore required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39937 - 2009-09-28
claim that the Deerprint development changed the use of the existing property and therefore required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39937 - 2009-09-28
State v. Reginald W. McDaniel
the claimed error is so prejudicial as to require the extreme remedy of terminating a trial. Oseman v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9107 - 2005-03-31
the claimed error is so prejudicial as to require the extreme remedy of terminating a trial. Oseman v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9107 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of Jason’s visits with Malakai is also in dispute. Jason claims that he played with Malakai in the back yard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29625 - 2007-07-10
of Jason’s visits with Malakai is also in dispute. Jason claims that he played with Malakai in the back yard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29625 - 2007-07-10
State v. Marc Norfleet
with a non-disclosed—informer, particularly under the circumstances where the defense is claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3991 - 2005-03-31
with a non-disclosed—informer, particularly under the circumstances where the defense is claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3991 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
), claiming that Telfer was negligent in the inspection and maintenance of the rental property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111823 - 2014-05-07
), claiming that Telfer was negligent in the inspection and maintenance of the rental property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111823 - 2014-05-07
89-CV-231 v. Oneida County
court claiming that the zoning ordinance was invalid because it was preempted by the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11810 - 2005-03-31
court claiming that the zoning ordinance was invalid because it was preempted by the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11810 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert M. Fowler
) (2003-04).[1] He claims the trial court erred when it concluded there was probable cause to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7074 - 2005-03-31
) (2003-04).[1] He claims the trial court erred when it concluded there was probable cause to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7074 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
his trial counsel was ineffective. To prevail on this claim, Luedtke must demonstrate that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91612 - 2013-01-14
his trial counsel was ineffective. To prevail on this claim, Luedtke must demonstrate that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91612 - 2013-01-14
State v. Alvin Dawson
his motion for postconviction relief. Dawson’s sole claim of error arises out of his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8146 - 2005-03-31
his motion for postconviction relief. Dawson’s sole claim of error arises out of his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8146 - 2005-03-31